-
-
Jul052009
Public Private Partnerships : Who is the boss ?
The most preferred model of building infrastructure today has become the public –private partnership. It is almost as if the government has somewhat shamefacedly admitted that their attempts to create infrastructure of any kind has not kept pace with the demands of the growing population and its requirements. But since complete privatization is still considered taboo, the state attempts to keep a foothold under the guise of a partnership with the private sector. But the word partnership is more or less a sham as the government , intentionally or otherwise is really a sleeping partner, having more or less abdicated key decision making powers, even when there is a key public interest involved and the government has on occasion a stake as high as 49 percent in the company’s equity holding.
Witness Delhi’s current power woes. The electricity distribution companies have lost all control over the situation and the electricity situation is as bad or worse as when power was supplied by the government run Delhi Vidyut Board. The government is not doing any thing more than having “stock taking” meetings and the chief minister is wringing her hands more or less expressing her helplessness to do any thing in the matter. Now of course, we all know that the fundamental issue is a shortage of power and of course we know that Delhi produces less than 50 percent of its power requirements. We also know that power plants can not come up in a day or even in a year and there are limitations on how much any one can immediately do. But surely, the situation can be managed a lot more tidily ?
Electricity is not the only field. Take airports for instance. In most of the airports that are being modernized today, the government is a stakeholder along with the private developers. Yet here too, the government remains a sleeping partner, appearing to rubber stamp decisions made by the private players involved. The user development fees charged at airports were mostly rubber stamped by the ministry of civil aviation , even though a an industry body as respected as the IATA recently commented that the charging of fees in lieu of amenities that would only be provided in the future after the airport is fully modernized is unethical.
Then look at schools and hospitals. Again after acknowledging that the government has on its own been unable to provide quality education , it has roped in the private sector as a partner. Private institutions got land at throw away prices and a host of other exemptions, with the proviso that in lieu of this , the public=private partnership based institutions would offer concessions and facilities to the poorer sections of society.
Have we noted the inherent flaws in the PP model ? It is essential to take note of the fact that the private sector will only penetrate sectors that are fairly certain to be money-spinning. Private investment will be ready to move into communications), but the same eagerness will not be seen in the case of rural sanitation. The distinction between the public and private sectors is not primarily in terms of operational efficiency as is often maintained (favoring the latter, often considered to be self-evident too), but in the manner in which the two recognize public need and respond to it. From this perspective, the private sector ought to be only be the junior partner in PPP, and the public sector must retain considerable powers to intervene when the acknowledged service obligations are not being met. But will it happen ? Not likely in the near future, by the looks of it.
The views expressed in this post are those of the writer and are not necessarily endorsed by Mutiny.in
Subscribe
Submit Link
Bystander
001
9:36 am
Honestly, what’s up with Mutiny ? Except for you no one seems to write ? Is it on it’s last leg ?
Eternal Truth
002
5:10 am
Whenever Public gets included, corruption and thus inefficiencies run high, thereby hurting entire business model. This is in turn increases the burden on tax payers.
Take example of Air India. It is a loss making organization, which keeps on committing blunders and has hardly been able to match any kind of competition. However if government tries to get rid of it, all the unions go on strike. Consequently, taxpayers continue to bear the burden of the greedy employees of Air India.
Just like Air India, look at Indian Railways. Lalu created illusion of much higher profits under his regime while making 2-3 fold increase in permissible load per boggie for the freights. These boggies carried load greater than the capacity of the railway tracks. As a result, we would need to incur heavy expenses on the worn out tracks which would easily offset the short term profits earned.
Look back few decades and think of the banks who used to serve customers as if they were doing a great favor for the customers. Similarly think of telecommunication systems back then, how difficult it was to get a telephone line.
I think Nehru made a huge blunder by adopting a complete socialistic economic model, eliminating private participation to a great extent. This left behind India to a great extent and as a result all of us and our previous generation suffered.
Now we better not repeat the mistakes of past.
iiuniveadds
003
9:10 am
Hi. Great stuff. I actually stumbled upon your blog accidentally but was amazed by its content. The information was really good and i would love to come back often. So I have given link to your blog from my blog. Same thing is expected from your side for good colleboration & mutual gain.
Rafijan S
004
10:12 am
The public=private partnership based institutions would offer concessions and facilities to the poorer sections of society. It’s good and new revolution…